The Big Lies People Tell In Online Dating

July 7th, 2010 by Christian Rudder

Nerds. As we all know, the Internet is a great place to pretend to be someone you're not. For instance, here's me in Second Life having a great time:

Anyhow, in many online situations, self-misrepresentation is totally harmless. Like, who cares if your Halo 3 avatar is taller than you are in real life? Or if flickr thinks you're single when you're really married? But in online dating, where the whole goal is to eventually meet other people in person, creating a false impression is a whole different deal.

People do everything they can in their OkCupid profiles to make themselves seem awesome, and surely many of our users genuinely are. But it's very hard for the casual browser to tell truth from fiction. With our behind-the-scenes perspective, we're able to shed some light on some typical claims and the likely realities behind them.

Let's get started.

"I'm 6 feet tall."

REALITY: People are two inches shorter in real life.

This whole post was inspired by an amusing graph we stumbled across while trying to answer the question Do taller guys have more sex? The answer, to a degree, is yes, and I'll expand on that in a little bit. But in this case what was more interesting than the sex was the (supposed) tallness of the guys.

The male heights on OkCupid very nearly follow the expected normal distribution—except the whole thing is shifted to the right of where it should be. You can see it better when we overlay the implied best fit below (pardon the technical language):

Almost universally guys like to add a couple inches. You can also see a more subtle vanity at work: starting at roughly 5' 8", the top of the dotted curve tilts even further rightward. This means that guys as they get closer to six feet round up a bit more than usual, stretching for that coveted psychological benchmark.

When we looked into the data for women, we were surprised to see height exaggeration was just as widespread, though without the lurch towards a benchmark height:

On a somewhat humbling personal note, I just went back and looked at my own profile, and apparently I list myself at 5' 11". Really, I'm a touch under 5' 10". Hmmm.

. . .

As for whether it even makes sense for people to make such an obvious and easily disproved exaggeration, the jury is out. We've found that taller people, up to a point, have more sex:

But as far as messages go, shorter women actually seem to get more attention:

These are the average weekly unsolicited message totals by height; you can think of these as the number of times a person is "hit on" out of the blue each week on OkCupid. a 5' 4" woman gets 60 more contacts each year than a six-footerThe genders are plotted on different scales because of the eternal fact that men almost always make the first move, so women get many more unsolicited messages.

It's plain from these two charts that women six feet or taller are either less attractive to men or are considered too intimidating to message. The data also raises the interesting possibility that these tall women are much more likely to sleep with a man who does approach them. Compare the 6' 0" woman to her 5' 4" counterpart: the taller woman gets hit on about two-thirds as much, yet has had slightly more sex partners.

"I make $100,000 a year."

REALITY: People are 20% poorer than they say they are.

Apparently, an online dater's imagination is the best performing mutual fund of the last 10 years. Here's what people are saying on OkCupid, versus what their incomes should be:

Use the slider to watch as people exaggerate more as they get older. As you can see, people advertise disproportionately high salaries for themselves. Just to pick a symbolic amount, there are consistently 4× the number of people making $100K a year than there should be.

Note that in formulating the "expected" lines for each age we were very careful to adjust for OkCupid's particular demographics: we compared every individual against the average not just by age but by zip code. Here a breakdown by gender of the exaggeration rates:

A woman may earn 76 cents on the dollar for the same work as a man, but she can fabricate, like, 85 cents no problem.

As a public service, we've decided to make our income calculations available. The following widget will calculate the statistically expected income of your potential matches; you give it a gender, an age, and a zip code, and it'll spit out a salary. Then you can confront your dates about exactly how much money they probably do or don't make. Fun!

. . .

We did a little investigating as to whether a person's stated income had any real effect on his or her online dating experience. Unsurprisingly, we found that it matters a lot, particularly for men. This is a by-age messaging distribution:

These bold colors contain a subtle message: if you're a young guy and don't make much money, cool. If you're 23 or older and don't make much money, go die in a fire. It's not hard to see where the incentive to exaggerate comes from.

"Here's a recent pic."

REALITY: The more attractive the picture, the more likely it is to be out-of-date.

The above picture, for example, was over two years old when it was uploaded. How do we know? Most modern cameras append text tags to the jpgs they take. These tags, called EXIF metadata, specify things like the exposure and f-stop settings, gps information if your camera has it, and, of course, the time and date the photo was taken. This is how programs like iPhoto know when (and sometimes where) you've taken your pictures.

Analyzing this stuff, we found that most of the pictures on OkCupid were of recent vintage; site-wide the median photo age at upload was just 92 days. However, hotter photos were much more likely to be outdated than normal ones. Here's a comparison (the age of a picture below is how old it was when it was uploaded to our site):

As you can see, over a third of the hottest photos on the site are a year old or more. And more than twice as many hot photos are over three years old (12%) as average-looking ones (5%), which makes sense because people are more inclined to cling to the pics that make them look their best

Another useful (if somewhat unorthodox) way to take in this graph is to follow the horizontal gridlines. If you trace out from "20%", for example, you can see that 1 in 5 average-looking photos is at least a year old, meanwhile, among the hot photos, nearly 1 in 5 is at least two years old.

It also turns out that older people also upload older photos:

The upshot here is, if you see a good-looking picture of a man over 30, that photo is very likely to be out-of-date. Not to get personal again, but my own OkCupid photo shows a Burberry-dressed 27 year-old, strumming away on his guitar. Meanwhile, I turn 35 in a couple months and am writing this post in the same shorts and tee-shirt I've been wearing for a week. Time waits for no man, unless that man doesn't update his personal information.

"I'm bisexual."

REALITY: 80% of self-identified bisexuals are only interested in one gender.

OkCupid is a gay- and bi-friendly place and it's not our intention here to call into question anyone's sexual identity. But when we looked into messaging trends by sexuality, we were very surprised at what we found. People who describe themselves as bisexual overwhelmingly message either one sex or the other, not both as you might expect. Site-wide, here's how it breaks out:

This suggests that bisexuality is often either a hedge for gay people or a label adopted by straights to appear more sexually adventurous to their (straight) matches. You can actually see these trends in action in the chart below.

Again, this is just the data we've collected. We'd be very interested in our bisexual users' thoughts on this single-sex-messaging phenomenon, so if you'd like to weigh-in please use the comments section. Please note, everybody, that we don’t assume that bis should be “into both genders equally.” We only assume that they should be into both genders at all. The swaths of red and blue that you see in these sexuality charts represent people who message only one gender. The purple areas are people who send any messages, in whatever proportion, to both men and women.

In this chart, throughout the teens and twenties, the male bisexual population is mostly observably gay men. By the mid-thirties, it seems, most of these men are more comfortable self-identifying as gay and have left the bi population. By the end of our chart, 3 of every 4 bi males on OkCupid are observably straight. Meanwhile, the proportion of men who message both women and other men holds fairly steady.

The proportions for women are more consistent over time:

12% of women under 35 on OkCupid (and the internet in general, I'd wager) self-identify as bi. However, as you can see above, only about 1 in 4 of those women is actually into both guys and girls at the same time. I know this will come as a big letdown to the straight male browsing population: three-fourths of your fantasies are, in fact, fantasies of a fantasy. Like bi men, most bi women are, for whatever reason, not observably bi. The primacy of America's most popular threesome, two dudes and an Xbox, is safe.

. . .

In gathering data for this last section on sexuality, we found so much interesting stuff that we're making it the topic of our next post. We'll look at the messaging, searching, and stalking (!) patterns of gay, bi, and straight people and see what else we can learn about the sexual continuum. Until then, no lie: thanks for reading.

OkCupid's data scientists, Max Shron and Aditya Mukerjee, contributed additional research to this post.
. . .
. . .

715 Responses to “The Big Lies People Tell In Online Dating”

  1. Logic Sheriff says:

    OF COURSE one would expect older people to have older pics, even if the motivation isn’t deception. How much does a person’s appearance typically change from50 to 55, as compared to from 20 to 25? It’s the 10 year old pics (and there are A LOT of ‘em) that crack me up.

    Also, they didn’t include people who don’t specify their income, which one can do for any of many reasons (most of which apply to low income or high income). Be interesting to see THEIR stats.

  2. BPooleAZ says:

    Wow. Lie at your peril, imo.

    As soon as I find out someone has lied about ANYTHING in an online dating profile – whether it’s personality traits, age, income, height – it’s a deal breaker.

    One exception (sort of) is body type. It’s a little subjective. What one person considers ‘average’ might be ‘thin’ to someone else and ‘curvy’ to another.

    I recently dated a woman whose entire profile was pretty much a lie – Laid back? Not. Honest and straightforward? Not. Active? Not. Comfortable in her skin? Horribly NOT.

    My profile is all me. What you see is what you get. My pictures are all less than a year old, and the ones that show my face or body include dates.

    So, please don’t lie, ladies. I want to meet who I THINK I am meeting. And lies are a pretty big indicator of insecurity, imo. Huge turn-off.

  3. artsyactivist (michele) says:

    re: bisexuality.

    Okay, I think you guys are a bit confused and miseducated when it comes to bisexuality. Just because a bisexual person choose to message only one sex opposed to both, does not mean that they are not bisexual. You can be bisexual where you are attracted to both sexes but still have a stronger preference towards one sex. It doesn’t make you straight or gay.

    Now does barsexuality where basically a straight (typically woman) is saying they are bisexual to get the attention from the boys exist? hell yes. but barsexuality is not the same as bisexuality.

    It is also possible that the bisexual user just happens to find more interesting people of one sex on this site then the other sex.

    It does not suggest that 80% of people who say they are bisexual on this site are lying.

    This article really pissed off and offended the bisexual community (a fellow activist when hearing that I just created a profile passed on this article to me).

  4. Faith Cheltenham says:

    Yup. Still waiting on OKC to do a real survey on bisexuality not based on their assumptions. HOW MANY USERS MSG BOTH GENDERS? Without even reading the bisexuality wikipedia page, OKC made a real assumption about bi folks and then followed it up with some treacherous math. Unfortunately, I fear bi folks can no longer champion the site as being wonderfully bi inclusive.

  5. BPooleAZ says:

    Yeah, that whole thing about who bisexual people message seemed a little weird. My son is bisexual, but he lives with his girlfriend. Admittedly, when he was in junior high school he said he was bi, then in high school he thought he was gay, then he came home with a girlfriend one day a few years ago – so there was some confusion along the way. But just because he lives with a girl doesn’t mean he’s not bi.

    I have looked at a few profiles of OKC men and a few have looked at mine. I guess that makes us bisexual. Hehe. Or maybe we’re just trying to appear more sexually adventurous. lol.

  6. Dharma56 says:

    This blog is a hoot.

    If you say you are 25 and you are really 45, that might be a problem.
    49 when you are really 52, probably not.
    If you say you make 100,000 and you really make 35,000, that might be a problem.
    75,000 when you really make 50,000, probably not.
    If you say you are 5′ 10″ and you are really 5′ 2″ that might be a problem.
    6 feet when you are really 5′ 10″, probably not.

    Of course, people lie on the Internet. It’s the Internet. It’s fun, it can be a fantasy, or can be a start to something real, or something real fun.

    Enter this human social interaction with few expectations and see what it can be, instead of what you want or hope it to be.

  7. Charlie says:

    I wonder how those bi charts would line up if you added a queer option for sexuality? I have read so many profiles that say “Actually, I’m queer”. And I have bounced myself back and forth between “gay” and “bi” because there is no “I’m not interested in straight folks” option.

  8. Cheshie213 says:

    I think that a lot of times bisexuals will come on here looking for a particular sex. I am bisexual, but am on here specifically to find a girl. I was a bit offended b this, but I guess I see where they are coming from. But sayng its a lie is pretty rude.

  9. AmarisSkye says:

    I am pansexual but listed as bi on OkCupid. I message both sexes but I tend to get an overwhelming amount of messages from men. I am not interested in dating men at the moment or meeting them on line because I already meet plenty in my day to day life. If I had my choice I would only receive messages from women even though I like both because men are far easier to pick up in my day to day life.

  10. xpfcwintergreen says:

    Regarding height, I’m 5’7″ (which I accurately list) and I wanted to comment on the taller women getting fewer messages trend. I don’t filter by height at all, but usually if I see someone interesting and she’s over 5’9″ or so, her profile usually includes “you are taller than me” as one of the messaging criteria so even if she otherwise seemed great I don’t send a message. Also, when I do decide to send a message, my response rate to anyone above 5’7″ is still much lower than when it’s 5’7″ and below.

    Relating this to the other topic, my personal experience is that more bisexual women care less about height than straight women so I end up with better luck with them.

  11. ss says:

    People shouldn’t be so quick to make a big deal. The important point is that computer monitors limit how people can represent themselves. Seems more like it started a conversation based on Statistical Facts. Now the interpretations are right for some people and not right for others. The point is, isn’t it better to have this information open to the public so we can have the conversation vs locked away because people take things too personally? Let’s try to see the bigger picture!

  12. Alikah says:

    I’m a self Identified “bi” woman. I’ve actually slept with a few women, and hen it comes to random fooling around, I can easily go both ways. Here’s the issue though, I have very hard time maintaining long term relationships with women, even just friendships. I am sexually attracted to woman, but I get better emotional connections with men. It’s just my personality. Also there never seems to be as many bi/gay women on this site, or at least that come up in my matches search.

    But to sum up my view on my bisexuality, because of all the “difficult” women I’ve met, I tend to be attracted to 1 woman for every 4-5 guys I’m attracted to, physically, and very rarely do I meet one I really connect with emotionally. Women are for fun, guys are for fun and have the possibility of something more serious.

  13. alguna_rubia says:

    I’m a bisexual chick, and I just want to point out that the reason I hardly ever contact chicks is the fact that there’s very few of them compared to guys on this site.

  14. Orangejelly says:

    I’m a bisexual woman, married 11 years to a bisexual man, we both have particular tastes when it comes to attraction of the sexes and we both agree… women are more attractive! Most men I see are drones and lack character (on the outside, no offence intended) and grooming. Online you can judge (which is probably not always a good thing lol) what’s attractive before you say hello. Therefore I would only generally chat and message one gender on sites like this. (This does not reflect on my real world and ‘gender’ preferences!!

  15. 123 says:

    The biased bi messaging graphs seem to show something interesting.
    http://cdn.okcimg.com/blog/lies/BiMenMessaging.png
    http://cdn.okcimg.com/blog/lies/BiWomenMessaging.png
    After 48-50 yo, messages shift more toward women. That despite the standard opinion that women lose attractiveness at middleage, while middleage men hold their attractiveness

    hey, have you ever tried two xboxes and a dude? or a ps, xbox and a dude? wink wink, nudge nidge, know what i mean, eh?